This is an article studying whether hold-ups, or the
potential for hold-ups, within a supply chain affect process integration and information
sharing between firms. The article
defines process integration as an investment with the goal being to enhance
process integration and/or information sharing between firms. Manufacturers are concerned valuable,
proprietary information given to the distributors will be leaked; while
distributors concerns center on manufacturers using internal sales teams to do
distributors jobs once a sales area is developed. The US is a transaction cost economy, an
economy which once dependence is established between firms the value from these
dependences can be shared between partners. The relevance of this study with the current
global financial crisis, firms are seeking an advantage to stay competitive, to
remain solvent, and, if feasible, increase profitability.
This study tested six different hypotheses. The study uses performance scorecards and
financial performance data (i.e. Sales Growth, Sales Productivity,
Profitability, Contract Renewal) collected from major petroleum manufacturers
and their relationships with independent petroleum distributors. The first hypothesis is “as asymmetry (or
unevenness) of interdependence increase, the extent of process integration and
information sharing in manufacturer-distributor partnerships decreases”
(Schloetzer 1011). The second hypothesis
is “as the magnitude of interdependence increases, the extent of process
integration and information sharing in manufacturer-distributor partnerships
increases” (Schloetzer 1011). The third
hypothesis is “the extent of process integration in manufacturer-distributor
partnerships enhances partnership financial performance” (Schloetzer 1011). The fourth hypothesis is “the extent of
information sharing in manufacturer-distributor partnerships enhances
partnership financial performance” (Schloetzer 1012). The last two hypotheses are “the extent of
process integration and information sharing in manufacturer-distributor
partnerships are directly (5th) or indirectly (6th)
related to distributor contract renewal via financial performance” (Schloetzer 1012).
The results for the first two hypotheses support the
main idea; when there is a larger interdependence, both partners then depend on
each other more and when there is larger unevenness between firms the reverse
is true. Results for hypotheses three
and four, show, in practice, larger supply chain integration allows firms to grow
larger together rather than seeing a larger benefit going to one partner in the
relationship. Hypotheses five and six
both predict positive relationships between supply chain integration and
contract renewal. The results of the
study also show that as process integration and information sharing grow
between firms so does sales growth & productivity and profitability.
The implication of this article is with the current
global financial difficulties and with firms increasingly looking for better
financial performance. A way to do this is
to increase process integration and information sharing between supply chain
partners. Rather than increasingly
benefiting only one firm in the relationship, this mixing process will increase
financial performance of both firms through sales growth & productivity and
overall profitability.
I learned from some articles regarding information exchange. The barriers and noises seem to emerge intentionally or unintentionally whenever information exchange (ie, information sharing) happens. I wonder if there's any universal solution for avoidance of such barriers and noises?
ReplyDeleteIn my opinon, this finding is better off for organizations especially in the current global crisis. Sharing information between the supply chains can help reduce the cost of labor and operational cost since they can experience what is good or not good to apply in their own manufacturinng. Therefore, the companies in the supply chain can booster their revenues when taking advantages on exploits from their members. The problem is that how to flow the information within company members only so that competitors do not easily obtain the secret of production in the supply chain. One more problem is that intergration means equal benefit for all members, as the result, it is not an incentive for innovation and effort.
ReplyDelete